1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2000 Suzuki Baleno

To start off, 2000 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki Baleno. (85 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki Baleno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 280 kg more than 2000 Suzuki Baleno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (204 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Suzuki Baleno. (103 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Suzuki Baleno.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Ford Tempo 2000 Suzuki Baleno
Make Ford Suzuki
Model Tempo Baleno
Year Released 1992 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2986 cc 1298 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 129 HP 85 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 204 Nm 103 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1195 kg 915 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4350 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2490 mm