1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 445 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 451 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Tempo | Celica |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2440 mm |