1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2001 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2001 Mazda AZ is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 415 kg more than 2001 Mazda AZ.
Because 2001 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 2001 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Tempo | AZ |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2370 mm |
