1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 710 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (204 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Tempo | SUW |
Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1097 cc |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2630 mm |