1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2002 Holden HSV
To start off, 2002 Holden HSV is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Holden HSV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Holden HSV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 521 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2002 Holden HSV | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Tempo | HSV |
Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 5698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 171 Nm | 692 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |