1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2002 Kia Rio
To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2002 Kia Rio. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 175 kg more than 2002 Kia Rio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (204 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Rio. (113 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 2002 Kia Rio | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Tempo | Rio |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 113 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2420 mm |
