1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2003 Mazda Premacy

To start off, 2003 Mazda Premacy is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Premacy (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Premacy should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Premacy weights approximately 220 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 171 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Ford Tempo 2003 Mazda Premacy
Make Ford Mazda
Model Tempo Premacy
Year Released 1992 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2307 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 171 Nm 171 Nm
Torque RPM 2600 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1165 kg 1385 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4350 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2680 mm