1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2003 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2003 Skoda Octavia is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2003 Skoda Octavia. (113 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2003 Skoda Octavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 155 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (204 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Skoda Octavia. (172 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Skoda Octavia.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2003 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Tempo | Octavia |
Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2520 mm |