1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Because 2004 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Tempo | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2490 mm |
