1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2004 Hyundai Elantra
To start off, 2004 Hyundai Elantra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Hyundai Elantra (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Hyundai Elantra should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (204 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Hyundai Elantra. (183 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Hyundai Elantra.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2004 Hyundai Elantra | |
Make | Ford | Hyundai |
Model | Tempo | Elantra |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1975 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2710 mm |