1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 342 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (257 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (204 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tempo | 6 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 257 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2680 mm |