1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 97 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 130 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Tempo | Clio |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2480 mm |