1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2006 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (204 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 2006 GMC Yukon | |
| Make | Ford | GMC |
| Model | Tempo | Yukon |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 5964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 509 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2950 mm |
