1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2007 Holden UTE
To start off, 2007 Holden UTE is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 260 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Because 2007 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 359 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm). This means 2007 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2007 Holden UTE | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Tempo | UTE |
Year Released | 1992 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 171 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |