1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Because 2007 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tempo | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2710 mm |