1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 405 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (297 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Tempo | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 297 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 98.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 86.7 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2380 mm |
