1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2008 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2008 Toyota RunX is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 65 kg more than 2008 Toyota RunX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota RunX. (127 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 2008 Toyota RunX | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Tempo | RunX |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 71.3 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |
