1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo. 2009 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Tempo | Epica |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
