1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (129 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 240 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (204 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Tempo | 6 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |
