1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2010 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2010 Renault Symbol is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Symbol (104 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Symbol should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 165 kg more than 2010 Renault Symbol.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (171 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Symbol. (148 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2010 Renault Symbol | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Tempo | Symbol |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 171 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2473 mm |