1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2011 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2011 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot 3008 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 3008 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Because 2011 Peugeot 3008 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 3008 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Peugeot 3008 (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2011 Peugeot 3008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Tempo | 2011 Peugeot 3008 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | Tempo | 3008 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1837 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1639 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2613 mm |
