1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2011 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2011 Renault Symbol is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (129 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2011 Renault Symbol. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Symbol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 195 kg more than 2011 Renault Symbol. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (204 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Symbol. (105 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2011 Renault Symbol | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Tempo | Symbol |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 204 Nm | 105 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2473 mm |