1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 444 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo. 2012 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Tempo | S60 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 171 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 1250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2776 mm |