1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 618 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHARGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (204 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | Tempo | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1813 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3052 mm |