1992 Ford Tempo vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 69 kg more than 2013 Kia RIO.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Kia RIO. (167 Nm @ 4850 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Kia RIO.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Tempo | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Tempo | RIO |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4850 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1096 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2570 mm |