1992 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1992 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Thunderbird (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 670 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Thunderbird (291 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Thunderbird | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Thunderbird | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 291 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 57 L |
