1992 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1992 Ford Thunderbird. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2010 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Thunderbird | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Thunderbird | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 65 L |