1992 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2011 Audi A6
To start off, 2011 Audi A6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi A6 (350 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1992 Ford Thunderbird. (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2011 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi A6 (440 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Thunderbird. (291 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Thunderbird | 2011 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | Thunderbird | A6 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 291 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4934 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1519 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2833 mm |
