1992 Holden Apollo vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 400 kg more than 1951 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Holden Apollo | 1951 Saab 92 | |
| Make | Holden | Saab |
| Model | Apollo | 92 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2480 mm |
