1992 Holden Apollo vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 45 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Holden Apollo | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Holden | Seat |
| Model | Apollo | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2660 mm |
