1992 Holden Apollo vs. 1964 Honda S600
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Honda S600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Honda S600 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1964 Honda S600. (54 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1964 Honda S600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 475 kg more than 1964 Honda S600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Honda S600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Honda S600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Holden Apollo | 1964 Honda S600 | |
| Make | Holden | Honda |
| Model | Apollo | S600 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 54 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2010 mm |
