1992 Holden Apollo vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. Both 1992 Holden Apollo and 1966 Triumph 2000 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 35 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Apollo | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Holden | Triumph |
Model | Apollo | 2000 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |