1992 Holden Apollo vs. 1971 Monteverdi 2000
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Monteverdi 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Monteverdi 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Monteverdi 2000 (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Monteverdi 2000 should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Monteverdi 2000 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1971 Monteverdi 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Monteverdi 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Apollo | 1971 Monteverdi 2000 | |
Make | Holden | Monteverdi |
Model | Apollo | 2000 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2560 mm |