1992 Holden Apollo vs. 1978 Mercedes-Benz T
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mercedes-Benz T is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mercedes-Benz T weights approximately 145 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Because 1978 Mercedes-Benz T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mercedes-Benz T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Apollo | 1978 Mercedes-Benz T | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Apollo | T |
Year Released | 1992 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2800 mm |