1992 Holden Apollo vs. 1978 Seat 131

To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Seat 131 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1978 Seat 131. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1978 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 240 kg more than 1978 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Seat 131 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Seat 131. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 131. (94 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 131.

Compare all specifications: