1992 Holden Apollo vs. 1978 Toyota Celica

To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 118 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 105 kg more than 1978 Toyota Celica.

Because 1978 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Toyota Celica. (152 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Toyota Celica.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Holden Apollo 1978 Toyota Celica
Make Holden Toyota
Model Apollo Celica
Year Released 1992 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1967 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 118 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 172 Nm 152 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 5200 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1205 kg 1100 kg
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2510 mm