1992 Holden Apollo vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 115 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (203 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Holden Apollo 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Holden Oldsmobile
Model Apollo Cutlass
Year Released 1992 1981
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 2966 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 118 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4900 RPM
Torque 172 Nm 203 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1205 kg 1320 kg
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2680 mm