1992 Holden Apollo vs. 1981 Suzuki Fronte

To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1981 Suzuki Fronte. (29 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1981 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 650 kg more than 1981 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Suzuki Fronte. (41 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Suzuki Fronte.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Holden Apollo 1981 Suzuki Fronte
Make Holden Suzuki
Model Apollo Fronte
Year Released 1992 1981
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 543 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 118 HP 29 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 172 Nm 41 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1205 kg 555 kg
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 3200 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1400 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2160 mm