1992 Holden Apollo vs. 1996 Renault Clio

To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1996 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 347 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Clio. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Holden Apollo 1996 Renault Clio
Make Holden Renault
Model Apollo Clio
Year Released 1992 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1171 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 118 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 172 Nm 88 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1205 kg 858 kg
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 3710 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2550 mm