1992 Holden Apollo vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Apollo | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Apollo | Maloo |
Year Released | 1992 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 542 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |