1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2000 Mazda B2500

To start off, 2000 Mazda B2500 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2000 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 535 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo.

Because 2000 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Holden Apollo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda B2500 (194 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Mazda B2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Holden Apollo 2000 Mazda B2500
Make Holden Mazda
Model Apollo B2500
Year Released 1992 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 2499 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 82 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 172 Nm 194 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1205 kg 1740 kg
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 5010 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2990 mm