1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2002 Mazda 2

To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 29 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2. 2002 Mazda 2 has automatic transmission and 1992 Holden Apollo has manual transmission. 1992 Holden Apollo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mazda 2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: