1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 205 kg more than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Apollo | 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Apollo | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2680 mm |