1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 634 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Apollo | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | Apollo | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 383 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2610 mm |