1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Kangoo weights approximately 495 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (114 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Apollo | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Apollo | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1992 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 114 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2610 mm |