1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Holden Apollo | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | Apollo | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2490 mm |