1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 1200 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Holden Apollo | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | Apollo | Livina |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1598 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 172 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 2405 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2610 mm |
