1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2009 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2009 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 2009 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Holden Apollo | 2009 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Holden | Proton |
| Model | Apollo | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 172 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2610 mm |
