1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2010 Fiat Ducato
To start off, 2010 Fiat Ducato is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 2,286 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Ducato is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Fiat Ducato (161 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Ducato should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 265 kg more than 2010 Fiat Ducato.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Ducato (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Ducato will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Holden Apollo | 2010 Fiat Ducato | |
| Make | Holden | Fiat |
| Model | Apollo | Ducato |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2286 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 172 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3460 mm |
