1992 Holden Apollo vs. 2010 Volkswagen Caddy

To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy. (101 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 1102 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Apollo (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy. (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Holden Apollo 2010 Volkswagen Caddy
Make Holden Volkswagen
Model Apollo Caddy
Year Released 1992 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 101 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 172 Nm 148 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 3800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1205 kg 2307 kg
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2690 mm